Super Daf › Bekhorot 19 › Gems from the Daf

Halachot · Bekhorot 19 · בכורות י״ט

Caesarean Offspring and Purchases from Gentiles

Learn how the Torah defines a firstborn animal and why an animal bought from a gentile yields a doubtful status.

Caesarean Deliveries and Subsequent Offspring

The Torah commands that the male offspring opening the mother's womb must be consecrated as a bekhor (firstborn). The Mishnah discusses a case where an animal is delivered via caesarean section (yotzei dofen), or an offspring is later born naturally from that same womb. Rabbi Tarfon treats both cases as doubtful, while Rabbi Akiva maintains that neither animal possesses firstborn sanctity.

The Gemara explains that Rabbi Akiva requires an animal to be the firstborn in every respect. The caesarean offspring opened no womb, and the later offspring was preceded by an older sibling. The Gemara concludes in accordance with Abaye that an animal which is a firstborn in only one aspect does not attain sanctity. This applies even if a female was delivered by caesarean and a male followed naturally through the womb.

The Rambam codifies that neither the caesarean-born offspring nor the offspring following it is consecrated. Maran rules identically in the Shulchan Arukh. Even if the first delivery was a female extracted through the flank, a male subsequently exiting the womb is completely exempt from firstborn sanctity because another offspring preceded it.

יוֹצֵא דֹּפֶן וְהַבָּא אַחֲרָיו שְׁנֵיהֶן אֵינָן בְּכוֹר. הָרִאשׁוֹן מִפְּנֵי שֶׁאֵינוֹ פֶּטֶר רֶחֶם וְהָאַחֲרוֹן מִפְּנֵי שֶׁקְּדָמוֹ אַחֵר.

Neither an animal born through Caesarean section, nor one born afterwards are considered as firstborn animals. The first is not, because it is not the first issue of the womb. And the second is not, because the first preceded it. (Mishneh Torah, Firstlings 2:4)

Animals Purchased from a Gentile

When an Israelite purchases a female animal from a gentile without knowing whether it previously gave birth, a question arises regarding its next male offspring. Rabbi Yishmael asserts that very young animals definitely consecrate their offspring to the kohen, as they could not have given birth earlier. Rabbi Akiva counters that an animal can miscarry a tinuf (unformed discharge) or a shilya (placenta), both of which exempt subsequent births even during the mother's first year of life.

Rabbi Akiva establishes that whenever parity is unknown, the offspring is a safek bekhor (doubtful firstborn). The Rambam rules that the offspring is a doubtful firstborn regardless of the animal's age at purchase. It is kept by the Israelite owner because of the standard monetary principle that the burden of proof falls on the claimant.

Maran rules in the Shulchan Arukh that the offspring is a doubtful firstborn whether the mother was acquired within its first year or afterward. Furthermore, a gentile's casual statement that the mother previously gave birth is not believed. The Rema adds that grooves in the horn cracks cannot be relied upon to prove the animal's age or parity.

הלוקח בהמה מהעובד כוכבים ואין ידוע אם בכרה וילדה ה"ז ספק בכור ויאכל במומו לבעלים ואינו לכהן

One who buys an animal from a gentile and it is unknown whether it gave birth, and it gave birth, it is a doubtful firstborn and is eaten by the owner upon blemish and is not given to the priest. (Shulchan Arukh, Yoreh De'ah 316:1)

Handling and Seizure of a Doubtful Firstborn

A doubtful firstborn possesses sanctity that forbids shearing and work, yet it cannot be offered on the Altar. The Mishnah teaches that the animal must graze until it develops a permanent blemish, after which the owner may slaughter and eat it.

The authorities debate what happens if a kohen forcibly seizes a doubtful firstborn from the owner's estate. The Rambam rules that while the owner is not required to give it to a kohen, if a kohen seizes it, the bet din does not expropriate it from his hand. Maran codifies this exact position in the Shulchan Arukh.

The Rema records a significant dispute and decides against Maran. He rules that the court expropriates the animal from the kohen. The Rema adds that even if the Israelite gave the animal away mistakenly, believing he was obligated to do so, the kohen must return it.

An animal is consecrated only when it is both the first to open the womb and the firstborn of all offspring.

Learn Bekhorot 19 on Super Daf