Bekhorot 28 elsewhere in Shas

Zevachim 37b:1: This verse teaches that a blemished firstborn is given to a priest as a gift, and that he may eat its meat.
Beitzah 27a:13: When they disagree is in a case of blemishes in the body, e.g., if an ear had been cut off or a foreleg broken, which are prominent blemishes whose appearance does not change after death.
Sanhedrin 33a:14-15: Rav Ḥisda says that the contradiction between the mishna here and the mishna in tractate Bekhorot as to whether or not the court brings the accused back to be judged again if new evidence arises can be answered as follows: The mishna there
Sanhedrin 33b:4: In the case from the mishna in tractate Bekhorot: He ruled that a pure item is impure, how could he cause a loss with his own hands?
Sanhedrin 33a:8-9: Rav Hamnuna raised an objection to Rav Sheshet from the continuation of the mishna cited earlier (Bekhorot 28b): There was an incident involving a cow of the household of Menaḥem whose womb was removed, and when Rabbi Tarfon was consulted h
Sanhedrin 93a:8: The Gemara asks: And where did Daniel go?
Sanhedrin 33a:10-11: Rav Hamnuna states his objection to Rav Sheshet: And if it is so that there is a distinction between the two types of judicial errors, let Rabbi Akiva say to Rabbi Tarfon: You err in a matter that appears in the Mishna, as the ruling that a
Sanhedrin 33a:2: § The mishna teaches that in cases of monetary law, the court brings the accused back to be judged again if new evidence arises, whether with a claim to exempt him or with a claim to find him liable.
Bava Kamma 100a:5: The Gemara returns to the matter at hand.

Learn Bekhorot 28 on Super Daf