Compensating Judges and Teachers Without Tainting the Mitzvah

Torah law prohibits receiving payment for mitzvot, yet communal functionaries must survive. Tosafot defines the precise halakhic boundary between forbidden wages, bribes, and permitted compensation for lost labor.

Void Rulings and Evident Lost Labor

The Mishnah states that if a person takes wages to judge a case, his rulings are void. This rule also applies to one who takes wages to testify or to sprinkle purification waters. However, Tosafot notes an apparent contradiction from a Mishnah cited in Ketubot. That Mishnah terms such a judge repulsive, yet rules that his verdicts remain valid.

Tosafot resolves this discrepancy by distinguishing the nature of the payment. If the litigant pays the judge a generic wage for rendering a decision, the judgment is void. But when the payment covers שכר בטלה דמוכח (demonstrated wage for lost labor), the judge renders valid rulings. Because he suffers an obvious loss by abandoning his work, compensating that loss does not invalidate his verdict.

The Difference Between Wages and Bribery

The Gemara derives the ban on paying judges from the verse where Moses states that he taught Israel for free. Rashi explains that one may not take wages for issuing rulings or for teaching Torah. Tosafot asks: if paying a judge is already prohibited by the example of Moses, why does the Torah write a separate verse against taking a bribe?

Tosafot answers that wages and bribery are entirely different legal categories. A wage is compensation for a judge's time and physical exertion. A bribe, by contrast, is money given to bias the judge to search out merit for one party. The prohibition of bribery applies even if the money is given to acquit the innocent party truthfully.

Livelihoods for Communal Judges and Teachers

Tosafot applies these principles to explain how judges and Torah teachers earn a living. In the Temple era, judges of civil decrees took their maintenance directly from the Temple treasury. They had no other occupation and needed funds to support their households.

Similarly, teachers who abandon commerce may receive payment under שכר בטילה דמוכח (demonstrated loss of work). If a scholar has no other means of sustenance, taking wages is permitted. When teaching young children, one may also receive payment for supervision and instruction in cantillation marks.

Tosafot Rejects Rashi on Idle Laborers

The Mishnah allows compensating an elderly judge or inspector as a laborer who was unable to work. The Gemara clarifies that he receives payment כפועל בטל (as an idle laborer) of that specific craft. Rashi explains this as paying someone to switch from a strenuous craft to an easier task. Under Rashi's reading, a carpenter accepts less money to sit and judge cases instead of doing hard labor.

Tosafot strongly rejects Rashi's interpretation. If the fee pays the person to perform an easier task, this amounts to receiving pay for a mitzvah. That violates the foundational prohibition against being paid to judge, testify, or return lost items.

Calculating Compensation for Total Idleness

To protect the integrity of the mitzvah, Tosafot redefines the calculation of an idle laborer. The court estimates what that specific worker would accept to remain יושב ובטל לגמרי (sitting completely idle) without performing any work at all.

Under this formula, the recipient receives no remuneration whatsoever for the mitzvah itself. He is reimbursed purely for the financial loss of leaving his trade. By measuring lost earnings against total inactivity, the law upholds Moses's mandate that sacred services must be rendered for free,.

Compensation for performing a mitzvah is strictly limited to reimbursement for evident lost labor, calculated as if the worker sat completely idle.

Learn Bekhorot 29 on Super Daf