Super Daf › Bekhorot 32 › Gems from the Daf
Elsewhere in Shas · Bekhorot 32 · בכורות ל״ב
Bekhorot 32 elsewhere in Shas
- Niddah 22b:16: The Gemara asks: What difference is there between formation and creation?
- Makkot 13b:14: The Gemara asks: And what significant difference is there between them that prevents derivation by means of a verbal analogy?
- Menachot 4a:11: The Gemara asks: What difference is there?
- Chullin 85a:14: The Gemara asks: Being that both terms refer to slaughter, what is the difference which one is used; didn’t the school of Rabbi Yishmael teach a verbal analogy with regard to leprosy of houses: The verse states: “And the priest shall return
- Horayot 8b:7: The Gemara asks: And what difference is there between the different verb conjugations?
- Menachot 45b:19-20: The Gemara asks: What difference is there whether or not the words are identical?
- Temurah 5b:1: And according to the opinion of Rava, this term: “Is most holy,” serves to exclude the case of a firstborn offering from the prohibition of sale.
- Arakhin 29a:1: GEMARA: The Sages taught: Dedications of property for priests have no redemption, and one gives the property to the priest.
- Bava Kamma 13a:7: This is as it is taught in a baraita: With regard to a firstborn offering it is stated: “You shall not redeem” (Numbers 18:17), indicating that the owner can never fully redeem the offering, thereby removing its sanctity.
- Shevuot 11b:5: Abaye asks: If so, if it died or was slaughtered, how can it be redeemed?
- Temurah 32b:12: And Reish Lakish says: According to the Rabbis, animals consecrated for Temple maintenance were included in the halakha of standing and valuation, as that verse is discussing animals consecrated for Temple maintenance.
- Bekhorot 14b:15: § The mishna further teaches: And if these animals died before they were redeemed, they may be redeemed and fed to dogs.