Super Daf › Bekhorot 41 › Gems from the Daf
Iyun of the day · Bekhorot 41 · בכורות מ״א
Androgynos: Blemished Male or Distinct Creation
אנדרוגינוס בריה בפני עצמה
Is an animal born with both sexes fundamentally a male afflicted with an anatomical blemish, or an entirely separate biological category?
A firstborn kosher male animal must be given to a כהן (priest) and offered on the altar, but if it develops a מום (blemish), it may be slaughtered and eaten outside the Temple.
The Mishnah discusses an אַנְדְּרוֹגִינוֹס (hermaphrodite animal) and states that according to the first tanna, one may not slaughter it in the Temple or outside. The Gemara asks why it cannot be slaughtered outside the Temple if it is considered a male whose female anatomy counts as a חָרוּץ (cleft blemish).
While the sages reject the flesh cleft as a disqualifying blemish, Rabbi Yishmael argues that there is no greater blemish than this, prompting an investigation into its true legal definition.
The question
Is an androgynos fundamentally a male possessing a visible bodily blemish, an unresolved doubt between sexes, or an independent entity entirely lacking firstborn sanctity?
Through the sources
The Gemara (Gemara)
תֵּעָשֶׂה נַקְבוּת חָרִיץ, וְיִשְׁחוֹט עָלֶהָ!The Gemara suggests treating the female organ of an androgynos as a cleft blemish on a male.
The Gemara (Gemara)
מִיפְשָׁט פְּשִׁיטָא לֵיהּ אַנְדְּרוֹגִינוֹס בְּכוֹר הוּא וּמוּמוֹ עִמּוֹ, אוֹ דִילְמָא סַפּוֹקֵי מְסַפְּקָא לֵיהּRava investigates whether Rabbi Yishmael considers the androgynos a definite firstborn male with a blemish or a case of uncertainty.
Rashi (Rishonim)
ואם ספק הוא אוכלו ישראל במום זה כדין ספק בכור הנאכל במומו לבעליםRashi explains that if the animal is in doubt, the Israelite keeps it because the burden of proof rests on the claimant.
Rashi (Rishonim)
הא ליכא ספק קמי שמיא אלא ודאי משום דבריה בפני עצמו הוא קממעיט ליהRashi notes that Scripture does not exclude doubts, proving the exclusion addresses a distinct creature in its own right.
Rabbeinu Gershom (Rishonim)
דאנדרוגינוס לא הוי בריה בפ"ע אלא זכר הוא ובכור ומומו עמוRabbeinu Gershom highlights the premise that the animal is not an independent entity but a male according to Rabbi Yishmael.
Tosafot (Rishonim)
ואנדרוגינוס כולן שוים דקמי שמיא גליאTosafot shows that unlike a hidden anatomy, the androgynos forms a uniform class whose status is fully revealed before Heaven.
The Gemara (Gemara)
לְעוֹלָם רַבָּנַן בָּתְרָאֵי, וְגַבֵּי בְּכוֹר תַּרְתֵּי קְרָאֵי כְּתִיב: ״הַזָּכָר״ וְ״הַזְּכָרִים״.The Gemara concludes according to the latter Rabbis that two verses specifically exclude this animal as a completely non-firstborn distinct entity.
Ways to understand it
Blemished Male View
The animal possesses male anatomy and is therefore born with innate firstborn holiness. Its female anatomy is merely an external blemish resembling a severe flesh cleft that permits its slaughter outside the Temple.
Distinct Independent Creation
The presence of dual anatomy creates a creature that is fundamentally neither male nor female. Because it is a בריה בפני עצמה (distinct creation), the Torah requires specific scriptural terms to exclude it entirely from firstborn sanctity.
Where it lands
The sugya concludes according to the latter Rabbis that an androgynos is excluded from firstborn sanctity as a distinct entity using the twin scriptural terms הַזָּכָר and הַזְּכָרִים. Consequently, it is treated as completely unconsecrated property and may be shorn and worked. Because codifications from the Rambam and the Shulchan Arukh are not supplied in this passage, the final codified statutory formulation is unavailable here.
An androgynos is legally classified as an independent physical category rather than a blemished ordinary male.