Bekhorot 42 elsewhere in Shas

Niddah 28b:17-18: The Gemara raises a difficulty with regard to Rav’s derivation: And is it correct that anywhere that the phrase “both male and female” is written in the Torah, this comes to exclude a tumtum and a hermaphrodite?
Shabbat 136b:5: And from where do we derive that he is not valuated?
Temurah 11a:6: And it is taught in another baraita that it is treated as a non-sacred animal, which means it is eaten by any person, not only priests, and such animals may be eaten anywhere outside the Temple courtyard, but they may not be eaten in the Te
Niddah 40a:7: The Gemara asks: And what do the Rabbis derive from this superfluous expression?
Menachot 70a:12: The Gemara asks: In what way is this case different from the halakha that is written on the tablet [appinkesa] of Ilfa: With regard to eggs found with the carcass of a kosher bird, some of them outside the bird and some of them inside the b
Zevachim 85b:10: Rav Naḥman bar Yitzḥak said: We learn in the baraita as well: A bird that was the object of bestiality, or that was set aside for idol worship, or that was worshipped as a deity, or that was given as payment to a prostitute or as the price
Yevamot 83b:14-15: And from where do we derive that it does not become sacred?
Zevachim 66b:7: If we say that he changed the pinching of the bird’s nape by leaving the head partially attached, as is proper for a sin offering, then from the fact that the latter clause, i.e., the first clause of the next mishna (66b), teaches: All of t
Temurah 17a:21: The Gemara raises another challenge to Shmuel’s opinion from the mishna.
Temurah 11a:9: § It is taught in a baraita that Rabbi Eliezer says: An animal crossbred from diverse kinds, and a tereifa, and an animal born by caesarean section, and an animal whose sexual organs are indeterminate [tumtum], and an animal that is a herma
Arakhin 4b:5: The baraita continues: This halakha, that a tumtum and a hermaphrodite are not included in valuation, is derived from the term: “The male” (Leviticus 27:3).
Yevamot 81a:4: Rabbi Yehuda says: If a tumtum, whose external sexual organs are indeterminate, was torn open so that his genitals were exposed, and he was found to be a male, he must not perform ḥalitza, because he is treated like a eunuch.

Learn Bekhorot 42 on Super Daf