Super Daf › Bekhorot 45 › Gems from the Daf
Elsewhere in Shas · Bekhorot 45 · בכורות מ״ה
Bekhorot 45 elsewhere in Shas
- Niddah 49b:5: § The mishna teaches: In any limb of the body where there is a nail, there is certainly a bone in it as well.
- Shabbat 48b:9-10: The Gemara answers: The Sages made a conspicuous distinction, so that one will not come to burn his teruma and other consecrated items because of it.
- Niddah 34a:10-11: Rava elaborates: The ziva of a gentile man is impure, even according to the opinion of Beit Shammai, as it is possible to implement a conspicuous marker with his semen, i.e., since his semen does not impart impurity whatsoever, everyone wil
- Shabbat 16a:4: The Gemara asks further: Their flat vessels should in any case become impure.
- Nazir 52b:8: How so? As when Beit Shammai say: From two or three bones, they mean either from two shins and one thigh, or from two thighs and one shin.
- Niddah 49b:6-7: Rav Ḥisda says: The following matter was stated by our great rabbi, Rav, may the Omnipresent come to his assistance.
- Bekhorot 38a:12: The reason for this is that through this ruling the Sages employed an indicator that it is impure only by rabbinic law so that people will not burn teruma and consecrated items due to having come into contact with those vessels, as by Torah
- Bekhorot 40a:13: With regard to the ruling of the mishna that an animal whose hooves were closed like those of a donkey is blemished, Rav Pappa says: Do not say that it is a blemish only in a case where its hooves are entirely like those of a donkey, i.e.,
- Sanhedrin 70b:17: From where is it learned that honey and milk are intoxicating?
- Nazir 4a:5: And this is to the exclusion of the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda, as it is taught in a baraita that Rabbi Yehuda says: If one ate a dried fig from Ke’ila, and similarly if one drank honey or if one drank milk, which can dull the senses, and ente
- Yoma 76a:15-76b:2: The Gemara rejects this proof: From where do you draw this conclusion?
- Chullin 78b:7: The Gemara asks: What is the opinion of Ḥananya, and what is the opinion of the Rabbis that were mentioned earlier?