Bekhorot 46 elsewhere in Shas

Gittin 36a:1-3: The Gemara answers that we administer the vow to the priest in public.
Yevamot 100a:14: MISHNA: With regard to a woman who did not wait three months after separating from her husband, and remarried and gave birth to a son, and it is not known if he was born after nine months of pregnancy to the former husband or if he was born
Nedarim 2b:12: Another mishna (Bekhorot 46a) states: There are some who are considered a firstborn with regard to receiving a double portion of inheritance, as they are the firstborn of their fathers, and they are not considered a firstborn with regard to
Arakhin 23a:7: The Gemara asks: But if so, consider that which Ameimar says: A vow that was taken in public has the option of nullification; if it was taken based on the consent of the public it does not have the option of nullification.
Tziyyun LeNefesh Chayyah on Chullin 68b:13: והנה מה שהקשה ממשנתנו על רב ולדידי מאי קושיא ודלמא משנתינו בבן קיימא וכרבנן
Yevamot 120a:10: GEMARA: The Sages taught in a baraita: If the witnesses saw his forehead but not the countenance of the face, or if they saw the countenance of the face but not his forehead, they may not testify that it is he, until they see both of them w
Yevamot 122a:13: As a result of this event, Rabban Gamliel remembered that people were murdered in Tel Arza, and Rabban Gamliel then allowed their wives to remarry based on only one witness.
Chullin 68a:7-8: The Gemara asks: And concerning this latter clause itself, what does it teach us?
Niddah 28a:14: If the fetus emerged in pieces, or if it emerged reversed, i.e., feetfirst rather than headfirst, when most of its limbs emerge, its status is like that of a child born, with regard to the impurity of a woman after childbirth.
Jerusalem Talmud Niddah 3:5:3: If it was in pieces and the head came out, what is the rule?

Learn Bekhorot 46 on Super Daf