Super Daf › Bekhorot 52 › Gems from the Daf

Tosafot · Bekhorot 52 · בכורות נ״ב

Inheritance, Enhancements, and Jubilee in Bekhorot

Tosafot examines why husbands differ from firstborns, how creditors collect from heirs, and whether divided inheritances reset at Jubilee.

Why the Mishna Omits the Husband

The mishna lists claimants who do not collect ראוי (prospective assets) or שבח (enhancement of property). This list includes a woman claiming her marriage contract, daughters claiming sustenance, and a levir. In the opening heading, Tosafot wonders why the mishna omits the husband from this list. After all, the halacha established elsewhere states that a husband does not take prospective property as in possessed property.

Tosafot answers that the husband is excluded because he does collect property enhancement. Because he is the sole heir to his wife, he acquires her estate immediately upon death. Any subsequent enhancement therefore accrues directly within his own domain. However, like a firstborn, he does not inherit prospective assets such as an uncollected loan owed to his wife.

משום דשבח נוטל כדפירש רבינו שמואל התם דכיון דאין יורש אלא הוא זוכה בנכסים מיד ובירושתו באו לשבח

Because he takes enhancement, as Rabbeinu Shmuel explained there: since there is no heir other than him, he acquires the property immediately, and it came to enhance within his inheritance. (Tosafot on Bekhorot 52a:4:1)

Creditors Claiming Enhancement from Heirs

The Gemara questions why a woman does not collect enhancement, noting Shmuel's rule that a בעל חוב (creditor) collects enhancement. Rabbi Abba clarifies that this exclusion is merely one of the leniencies of the marriage contract. Rashi explains that an ordinary creditor collecting from buyers seizes both the land and its enhancement. Tosafot establishes that the mishna is actually discussing collecting directly from the orphans.

Tosafot questions how a creditor can collect enhancement from orphans. A creditor cannot collect enhancement from a gift recipient, because a gift recipient has no seller to seek reimbursement from. Since orphans also have no one to turn to, why should they lose their enhancement? Tosafot answers that an heir is legally viewed as the leg of his father. To prevent locking the door before borrowers, the Sages allowed collecting enhancement from the father's heirs.

The Exception of Designated Collateral

The Gemara elsewhere appears to contradict this rule, stating that orphans who enhance property can dismiss the creditor with money. Tosafot resolves this contradiction by limiting that case to where the land was made an אפותיקי (designated security). When property is made explicit collateral, it is viewed as already collected by the creditor.

Because the land legally belongs to the creditor once the debt matures, the orphans planted it without clear authorization. In that specific situation, the creditor must compensate the orphans for their enhancement. Where no explicit pledge was made, the creditor takes the enhancement without paying.

Divided Inheritances in the Jubilee Year

Rabbi Asi cites Rabbi Yoḥanan that brothers who divide an estate are legally considered purchasers and return their portions in the יובל (Jubilee Year). Rashi notes that after the land returns, the brothers go back and re-divide the estate. Rabbeinu Tam objects: if every division is a purchase returning in Jubilee, no one could ever bring בכורים (first fruits). One would need an unbroken single-son lineage reaching back to the initial division under Joshua!

Tosafot offers two resolutions to defend the halacha. First, only Rabbi Yoḥanan maintains that divided inheritances return in the Jubilee Year. The other Sages hold that only an ordinary sale returns, while inherited divisions do not return. Alternatively, the initial division under Joshua was divinely ordained by prophets and the Urim VeTumim. Because that first division was permanent, subsequent divisions retain true ancestral ownership.

אבל כולהו אחריני סברי אע״ג דלקוחות הן דאין ברירה מכר הוא דאמר רחמנא דליהדר ביובל ירושה ומתנה לא

But all the others maintain that even though they are purchasers because ein bereirah, the Torah said that a sale must return in Jubilee, whereas an inheritance and a gift do not. (Tosafot on Bekhorot 52b:12:1)

While a husband inherits enhancement because he takes ownership instantly, divided estates retain their ancestral standing despite technical rules of purchasing and Jubilee.

Learn Bekhorot 52 on Super Daf