Bekhorot 43 – בכורות מ״ג | Daf Yomi with Rashi, Tosafot, the Rambam and halacha

What Bekhorot 43 teaches

Priests with full blemishes profane the service, bodily anomalies violate a positive command, while mere unsightly traits carry only rabbinic bans.
Superfluous verses link human and animal blemishes, while distinct verses are required because priests, sacrifices, and firstborns possess unique sanctities.
A gibben is a priest lacking eyebrows or having a severely crooked spine, and a flat-nosed priest is disqualified from service.

The sugyot

Rava identifies practical differences between whether a טומטום is considered a definite or doubtful congenital eunuch regarding levirate obligations.
The Mishnah establishes that all animal blemishes disqualify priests, alongside uniquely human head deformities, hunchbacks according to the Sages, and severe baldness.
The Gemara derives the interchangeability of blemishes between humans and animals through a verbal analogy, explaining why common and unique blemishes are repeated across both passages.
The Gemara proves that verses disqualifying blemishes in priests, sacrifices, and firstborn animals are each indispensable and cannot be derived from one another.
The Gemara establishes three tiers of priestly disqualifications: full blemishes profane service, bodily anomalies violate a Biblical command, and unsightly traits are rabbinic.
The Gemara clarifies head and neck deformities that disqualify a priest, and debates whether a hump without bone constitutes a disqualifying bodily blemish.
The Gemara debates whether baldness disqualifies a priest when hair rings both the front and back of his head or only the back.
The Gemara clarifies that bald, dwarf, and leaky-eyed priests are disqualified by Torah law, rejecting a lenient baraita attributed to Rabbi Yehuda.
The Mishnah debates whether the biblical blemish of gibben refers to missing eyebrows, drooping eyebrows, or an abnormal back.
The Gemara reconciles the Mishnah with a baraita, concluding that lacking eyebrows is derived from the connective word "or" in "or a gibben".
The Gemara resolves a contradiction regarding viability by explaining that the disqualified priest merely has a crooked spine that looks double.
The Mishnah defines a חָרוּם (flat-nosed man) and lists various blemishes of the eyes, concluding with defects disqualified only rabbinically.
The Gemara defines the blemish of a חָרוּם (flat-nosed priest) and debates how severely sunken the nose must be.

Halachot from the daf

Three categories of blemishes disqualifying a priest or sacrificial animal
Disqualification of a priest by permanent, transient, or congenital blemishes
Disqualification of a blemished priest from the sacrificial service
Blemishes not anatomically applicable to human beings
Counting the prohibition against offering a blemished firstborn
Validity of service performed by a priest with human-specific bodily anomalies
Entering the Sanctuary beyond the altar with human-specific blemishes without serving
Disqualification of a priest whose head has an abnormal shape
Disqualification of a hunchbacked priest with or without bone displacement
Which patterns of baldness disqualify a kohen from Temple service
Which physical defects disqualify a priest due to מראית העין
Disqualification of a priest with continually tearing or leaky eyes
Eyebrow blemishes that disqualify a priest from Temple service
Consumption of an animal fetus with two backs and spines
Childbirth impurity for miscarrying an entity with two spines
Disqualifying eye position and vision defects for Sanctuary service
Priestly disqualification due to blemishes of the eyes

Gems from the Daf

Learn Bekhorot 43 sugya by sugya on Super Daf: the Gemara in Hebrew and English with Rashi, Tosafot, the Rishonim, the Rambam and the Shulchan Arukh woven in. Free.