Super Daf › Bekhorot 43 › Gems from the Daf
Halachot · Bekhorot 43 · בכורות מ״ג
Priestly Disqualifications and Anomalous Offspring in Halacha
Understanding the three categories of priestly blemishes, bodily anomalies, and the status of creatures with duplicate spines.
Three Categories of Priestly Disqualifications
The Torah requires that any priest performing the sacred sacrificial service in the Sanctuary must be completely unblemished. The Gemara clarifies that physical disqualifications fall into three distinct legal categories. The first class consists of standard blemishes that disqualify both humans and sacrificial animals alike, whether congenital, permanent, or transient. Any priest afflicted with one of these physical defects is disqualified from Temple service until the condition fully heals. If a priest with such a full blemish serves at the altar, he profanes the sacrificial rite.
The second class consists of anatomical anomalies unique to human beings, derived from the requirement that a priest must be equal among the offspring of Aaron (שוה בזרעו של אהרן). Although such an anomaly violates a Torah command if he serves, it does not profane the service post facto. The third class consists of superficial defects disqualified solely due to visual appearance (מראית העין), such as fallen eyelashes or lost teeth. These defects represent purely rabbinic enactments and do not carry a biblical violation.
כָּל הַמּוּמִין כֻּלָּן אֶחָד שֶׁהָיוּ בּוֹ מִתְּחִלַּת בְּרִיָּתוֹ וְאֶחָד שֶׁנּוֹלְדוּ בּוֹ אַחַר כֵּן בֵּין עוֹבְרִין בֵּין שֶׁאֵינָן עוֹבְרִין הֲרֵי זֶה פָּסוּל עַד שֶׁיַּעֲבוֹרוּ:All physical blemishes - whether the priest had them from birth or acquired them afterwards, whether they will heal or they will not heal - disqualify [him] until they heal. (Mishneh Torah, Admission into the Sanctuary 6:3)
Anomalies of the Head, Back, and Hair
The Mishnah details bodily irregularities that apply specifically to priests. Among these are abnormal cranial shapes, such as a head that is pointed like a barrel cover, turnip-like, hammer-shaped with a protruding forehead, or indented. The Rambam codifies that these abnormal cranial structures render a priest disqualified from Sanctuary service.
The Gemara further analyzes a hunchback (בעל חטוטרת). Where the hump contains a displaced bone or vertebra, all authorities agree the priest is disqualified. Where the deformity consists only of swollen flesh without skeletal displacement, the halacha follows the Sages that he remains disqualified as an anomaly. Regarding baldness, a priest without hair on his crown is fit only if a row of hair encircles the back of his head from ear to ear. If hair remains only in the front, or if he is completely bald, he is disqualified.
Creatures with Two Backs and Spines
While analyzing the biblical term gibben (גבן), Rabbi Ḥanina ben Antigonus describes a person who has two backs and two spines. The Gemara questions whether such an entity can survive, citing the ruling of Rav regarding miscarriages. Rav resolved that regarding an adult priest, the text refers to a person whose single spine is severely crooked, making him appear dual-backed.
However, regarding an actual fetus born with two backs and two backbones, the Gemara establishes that it cannot survive. Consequently, if a woman miscarries such an entity, it does not constitute a viable newborn, and she does not contract the impurity of childbirth (טומאת לידה). In the realm of kosher law, if one slaughters an animal and discovers within it a fetus possessing two backs and two spines, the creature is strictly forbidden for consumption. Maran records this rule verbatim in the Shulchan Arukh, affirming that such a creature found inside a slaughtered beast is prohibited. A gloss from the Rema is not available for this passage.
השוחט את הבהמה ומצא בה בריה שיש לה שני גבין ושני שדראות אסור:If after slaughtering an animal we find a creature that has two backs and two spines, it is not permitted. (Shulchan Arukh, Yoreh De'ah 13:6)
Priests are disqualified by standard blemishes, distinct human structural anomalies, or visual defects, while an animal fetus bearing duplicate spines is deemed non-viable and prohibited to eat.