Super Daf › Bekhorot 50 › Gems from the Daf
Tosafot · Bekhorot 50 · בכורות נ׳
Valuing Ancient Coins for Biblical and Rabbinic Law
Tosafot analyzes how Talmudic coin values align with historical purchasing power, exchange surcharges, and rabbinic legislation.
Calculating the Redemption of the Firstborn
The Torah requires a father to redeem his firstborn son with five silver סלעים (sela'im, biblical shekels) given to a kohen. To clarify the exact value, the Gemara on our daf explores various historic coins used in marketplace commerce.
Rabbi Yochanan teaches that five biblical sela'im equal twenty silver dinars, which can be extracted from a large gold dinar worth twenty-five silver dinars. By subtracting five silver dinars, one arrives at the exact biblical redemption amount.
Emperors' Names or Physical Coin Shapes
Rabbi Yochanan refers to the coin as a דינרא הדריינא טריינא שייפא. Rashi explains that these terms name the Roman emperors Hadrian and Trajan who struck them, while the third word denotes an additional king.
Rabbeinu Tam objects that the Gemara connects these coins to the Temple treasury of Jerusalem, which bore inscriptions of David and Solomon rather than Roman rulers. He therefore translates the terms descriptively as round, large, and worn smooth.
Tosafot defends Rashi by distinguishing between coins of the First and Second Temple eras. Coins of the Second Temple could easily have been captured, melted, or restamped under Roman imperial authority.
פירש בקונטרס הדריינא על שם הדריינוס קיסר וטוריינוס קיסרThe Kunteres explained: Hadrayana after Hadrian Caesar, and Taryana after Trajan Caesar. (Tosafot on Bekhorot 50a:1:2)
The Changing Ratio of Gold to Silver
The Gemara states that one gold dinar was sold for twenty-five silver dinars. This standard 25:1 exchange rate appears across several tractates of the Talmud.
Tosafot is troubled by a glaring economic contradiction. In medieval Europe, an ingot of gold was worth at most ten ingots of silver. How could the relative value of gold have fallen so drastically since the Talmudic era?
ויש לתמוה דעכשיו אין זקוק של זהב שוה יותר מעשרה זקוקים של כסף לכל היותר ואיך נשתנה כל כך שער הזהב והכסףAnd one must wonder: nowadays an ingot of gold is not worth more than ten ingots of silver at most, so how could the exchange rate of gold and silver have changed so drastically? (Tosafot on Bekhorot 50a:1:3)
Double Weight and the Exchange Surcharge
Rabbeinu Tam resolves the discrepancy by demonstrating that a gold dinar weighed double a silver dinar. Thus, by weight alone, gold was valued at twelve times silver, consistent with ancient Midrashic accounts.
The extra twenty-fifth dinar was not intrinsic metal value, but an added הכרע (surcharge) paid when exchanging large coins with a moneychanger. Alternatively, Rabbeinu Yehudah bar Natan explains that the extra dinar covered the minting fees of coin production.
Biblical Standards Versus Provincial Rabbinic Coinage
Later, the Gemara cites Rav Asi: every fixed sum in the Torah is paid in high-grade Tyrian coinage, while rabbinic sums use provincial currency. Provincial currency was worth only one-eighth of genuine Tyrian money.
Tosafot challenges this rule from explicit rabbinic laws. The Sages ruled that a fine of a מנה (maneh, one hundred dinars) for a slap is assessed in full Tyrian currency. Furthermore, the rabbinic כתובה (ketubah, marriage contract) of a widow requires a full Tyrian currency payment.
Limiting the Rule to Sela Denominations
To resolve this contradiction, the Ri explains that Rav Asi never intended to downgrade every rabbinic payment. The rule of provincial currency applies exclusively to payments specifically denominated in סלעים (sela'im).
Since biblical penalties are framed in sela'im, any rabbinic fine that simply specifies a sela was reduced to half a dinar. By contrast, rabbinic enactments formulated in terms of a maneh or zuz retain their standard Tyrian value.
ונראה לר"י דלא מיירי הכא אלא בסלעים דומיא דכסף קצוב האמור בתורה שאין כתוב בתורה אלא שקליםAnd it appears to Ri that it refers here specifically to sela'im, parallel to the set money stated in the Torah, for the Torah writes nothing other than shekels. (Tosafot on Bekhorot 50b:8:1)
Apparent anomalies in Talmudic monetary values reflect distinctions in coin weight, exchange surcharges, and the precise denomination chosen by the Sages.