Bekhorot 35 – בכורות ל״ה | Daf Yomi with Rashi, Tosafot, the Rambam and halacha
What Bekhorot 35 teaches
- A firstborn injured accidentally or while fending off its attack may be slaughtered, but deliberately induced blemishes permanently forbid it.
- One may intentionally blemish a firstborn fetus before it fully emerges from the womb, since sanctity applies only upon birth.
- A priest's children may testify that his firstborn was injured naturally, but his wife cannot because she is considered like himself.
The sugyot
- Abaye teaches that rabbinic penalties for intangible damage target the wrongdoer personally, so the son is exempt from paying after his father dies.
- The Mishnah rules that blemishes caused unintentionally or without design to permit slaughter are valid, while deliberate blemishes render the firstborn forbidden.
- The Gemara demonstrates why the Mishnah must record both the gentile and child incidents to permit inadvertently blemished firstborn offerings.
- The Gemara clarifies which phrasing inadvertently invites a gentile to blemish a firstborn and defines the scope of intentional and unintentional blemishes.
- A firstborn animal injured by someone defending himself from its attack may be slaughtered, because the injury lacked improper intent.
- The Gemara debates whether kicking a firstborn animal after it stopped pursuing is forbidden as an intentional blemish or permitted as lingering distress.
- One may blemish an unborn firstborn before delivery, and an internal mouth defect visible only when bleating qualifies as a valid external blemish.
- The Mishnah debates whether priests, suspected of blemishing firstborns for personal consumption, can testify that another priest's firstborn was blemished naturally.
- The Gemara determines which shepherds may testify about blemishes and concludes that Israelites are not suspected of intentionally causing blemishes.
- The Gemara rules like Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel that a priest's children may testify on his firstborn, but his wife is invalid as himself.
- Rav Pappa asks how priests can judge cases according to Rabbi Meir, who treats anyone suspected of one transgression as suspected across the entire Torah.
Halachot from the daf
- Exemption of heirs from rabbinic penalties for unnoticeable damage
- Slaughtering a firstborn blemished by a gentile or minor
- Concern that a minor will habituate to transgressions upon reaching adulthood
- Causing a blemish to a בכור via indirect causation
- Blemish caused following an offhanded conversation
- Slaughtering a pursuing firstborn blemished by kicking it
- Inflicting a blemish on a firstborn before birth
- Internal gums uprooted as a visible blemish
- Credibility of a kohen testifying on another kohen's firstborn animal
- Credibility of shepherds testifying on blemishes of a בכור
- Credibility of an Israelite regarding a blemish on a ספק בכור
- Credibility to testify on blemishes of an animal tithe
- Credibility of priests, children, and wives regarding firstborn blemishes
Gems from the Daf
- Iyun of the day: Ishto Kegufo in Ritual Testimony
- Daf prep: Before you learn Bekhorot 35
- 3 to remember: Bekhorot 35: three things to remember
- The Passuk: Priests as Judges and the Suspicion of Blemishes
- Halachot: Blemishing Firstborn Animals and Penalties on Heirs
- The Rambam’s view: Blemishes, Fines, and Credibility in Firstborn Offerings
- Tosafot: Blemishing, Testimony, and the Integrity of Priests
- Machloket: Words That Hint and Kicks That Linger
- Words to know: Bekhorot 35: words to know
- Masechet so far: The masechet so far, chapter by chapter
- Elsewhere in Shas: Bekhorot 35 elsewhere in Shas
Learn Bekhorot 35 sugya by sugya on Super Daf: the Gemara in Hebrew and English with Rashi, Tosafot, the Rishonim, the Rambam and the Shulchan Arukh woven in. Free.